Flirting Is a Political Act

I was standing outside a club in Brooklyn when I noticed two people trying very hard not to look at each other. One was sitting on a concrete barrier near the smoking area, the other standing in a loose circle of friends several feet away. Every few minutes, one of them would glance over. Then the other would. Then both would immediately find something else to focus on. A cigarette. A drink. A friend telling a story. Anything except the obvious fact that they were interested in one another.

I watched this continue for nearly 40 minutes.

Eventually, one of them walked over and said something. I have no idea what it was. The music from inside spilled through the doors every time someone entered or exited, swallowing entire conversations before they could reach the sidewalk. Whatever was said, though, it worked. An hour later, they were dancing together.

It's a completely unremarkable story. In fact, for most of human history, it would have been so ordinary that it wouldn't have been worth mentioning at all. Two people noticed one another, exchanged a few words, and spent the rest of the evening together. That's not exactly headline material.

Lately, I find myself thinking about moments like this more and more because they feel increasingly rare.

We live in an age where we have unprecedented access to one another. Every person we've ever dated, every crush we've ever had, every attractive stranger we pass on the train exists only a few taps away. We can learn someone's political beliefs, favorite bands, relationship history, and vacation habits before we've even heard the sound of their voice. Entire industries have been built around convincing us that connection is easier than it has ever been.

Yet for all of this access, many of us seem terrified of each other.

The statistics around loneliness have been discussed so frequently that they've almost become background noise. Every few months, another study emerges showing that people are spending less time with friends, dating less frequently, having less sex, and reporting higher levels of isolation than previous generations. Social media was initially sold to us as a tool for connection, but it has become what feels like a substitute for it. We know more about each other than ever before and somehow understand each other less.

The problem is not that technology exists. Dating apps are not inherently evil. For many queer people, myself included, digital spaces have often provided access to communities and relationships that might otherwise have been difficult or impossible to find. The issue is that somewhere along the way, we began treating them as replacements for public life rather than extensions of it.

What gets lost in that transition is the strange, messy uncertainty that accompanies genuine human interaction.

Flirting has always involved risk. That's part of its function. It requires approaching someone without knowing how they will respond. It requires accepting that another person is fundamentally unknowable, that they possess desires and boundaries and histories entirely separate from your own. It asks us to risk embarrassment, rejection, and misunderstanding in exchange for the possibility of connection.

Modern life encourages precisely the opposite behavior.

We live in a culture that encourages us to curate ourselves before presenting ourselves. To optimize. To filter. To edit. We spend hours selecting photographs, refining captions, and constructing digital versions of ourselves that can be safely consumed by others. We communicate through carefully drafted messages rather than spontaneous conversation. We watch each other from a distance before deciding whether engagement feels safe enough to pursue.

In many ways, we've become exceptionally skilled observers.

Participation is another matter entirely.

This is one of the reasons I find myself so drawn to nightlife. Long before I started writing about clubs, I loved them because they felt like one of the few places left where strangers still regularly interacted without a clear objective. Nobody asks what your LinkedIn profile looks like at three in the morning. Nobody cares about your productivity metrics on a dance floor. For a few hours, people are forced back into their bodies. They make eye contact. They move together. They share physical space.

The dance floor has always been social technology disguised as entertainment. For centuries, dancing has provided people with a structured way to encounter one another. It creates opportunities for attraction, friendship, collaboration, and community to emerge organically rather than algorithmically. It asks people to remain present in a room instead of disappearing into a feed.

What I consistently recognize when looking around at clubs, bars, and parties is people who seem hungry for this kind of interaction. They want to talk to strangers. They want to meet people organically. They want stories that don't begin with a swipe. Functionally, they often appear unsure of how to do it.

Part of this uncertainty stems from the fact that many of us have simply fallen out of practice. Social skills are exactly that: skills. They require exercise. They require repetition. They require occasional failure. A generation raised on mediated interaction has inherited fewer opportunities to develop comfort with spontaneous encounters. As a result, ordinary social risks can begin to feel disproportionately frightening.

This is where flirting becomes political.

Not because romance itself is political, but because flirting represents a refusal to accept isolation as inevitable. It is a small act of faith in public life. It is an acknowledgment that meaningful experiences often emerge from situations we cannot fully control. Every time someone starts a conversation with a stranger, introduces themselves at a party, or walks across a room to speak to someone they've been noticing all night, they are choosing participation over observation.

That choice feels progressively significant.

We spend so much of modern life consuming one another. We scroll through photographs. We watch stories. We monitor updates. We collect information. Flirting interrupts that process. It asks us to stop treating other people as content and start treating them as people. It demands presence. It demands attention. Most importantly, it demands vulnerability.

Vulnerability is becoming a surprisingly scarce resource.

Perhaps that is why the interaction between those two strangers outside the club stayed with me. Not because their interaction was extraordinary, but because it reminded me how much courage ordinary connection now seems to require. Forty years ago, nobody would have described walking across a room to talk to someone as an act of resistance. Today, it most certainly feels like one.

In a culture that rewards distance, choosing proximity matters. In a culture that encourages observation, choosing participation matters. In a culture that often treats human beings as profiles, audiences, consumers, and data points, choosing to risk genuine connection matters.

Maybe the point isn't whether they went home together.

Maybe the point is that for a few hours, in a city constantly mediated by algorithms, surveillance, and screens, they occupied the same room and chose to risk being known.

The dance floor has always been a place where strangers become less strange. Where friendships begin, where lovers meet, where communities form. Every meaningful relationship starts the same way: two people acknowledging each other's existence.

That sounds simple until you realize how many forces now encourage us to do anything but.

So perhaps flirting is political. Not because it's revolutionary, but because it insists on something increasingly radical: that other people are worth approaching.

Clarity has arrived: 50% off your first order

Lazarus Naturals' Clarity mushroom gummies are thoughtfully formulated with Lion’s Mane, Panax Ginseng, and Alpha-GPC, combining the powers of science and nature to boost your mood, sharpen your focus, and support overall cognitive function. Get 50% off your first order of Clarity gummies and experience the difference for yourself!

Get 50% off Clarity

Valid for first-time customers only. Discount applies to 20ct and 60ct bottles of Clarity mushroom gummies.

Panic is a financial news strategy. Clarity is ours.

Markets move. Headlines catastrophise. But somewhere inside the noise is the story that matters — the opportunity, not the fear. 

The Daily Upside was built by Wall Street insiders to find it — global business and finance, reported without the alarm.

Join 1M readers →